How AI agents shape experts’ judgment calls t.co/FasbslN2Og ✍️ @amacinho @HaileyJoren @AlexTamkin via @AnthropicAI 👉 In a randomised controlled trial the authors found that professional data analysts followed a secretly assigned AI preference on 86% of open-ended judgment calls. 👉 Alarmingly, 77% of the experts repeated the AI agent's reasoning word-for-word in post-task surveys, yet only 15% credited the AI as the source of their arguments. 👉 This study shatters the comforting illusion of the "human-in-the-loop" safety framework by proving that experts unconsciously internalise and plagiarise algorithmic biases under the guise of independent peer review. 💡 Since professional judgment can be completely hijacked by a system prompt, the authors issue a warning: as we delegate more logic to AI, we risk creating an epistemic feedback loop where human values are quietly replaced by corporate machine defaults. @Corix_JC @TheAIObserverX @maponi @maria_axente @JagersbergKnut @ahier @ChuckDBrooks @Shi4Tech @CEO_AISOMA @sallyeaves @ThEiLe0 @dinisguarda @TarakRindani @FrRonconii @Ym78200 @Nicochan33 @Khulood_Almani @TysonLester @SusanHayes_ @EstelaMandela @JoannMoretti @sulefati7 @FernandaKellner @pchamard @NeiraOsci @darioandriani @ALouiseLavalett @Fabriziobustama @amalmerzouk @arlenenewbigg @drsharwood @mikeflache @RLDI_Lamy @smaksked @Eli_Krumova @PVynckier @chidambara09 @sminaev2015 @NathaliaLeHen @MHcommunicate @DanielleLargier
- 2 réponses
- 23 partages
- 33 j'aime
- 870 vues